Why hasn't Vista sold well?
When we tell them that the new OS is faster and better, only to have the upgrade break a piece of software that we don’t care about but they really do, we burn our likelihood that they’ll ever willingly upgrade again. Every time we tell them that they can now easily edit video or make DVDs, only to have them abandon their first effort in frustration and never attempt it again because our software sucks, we drive them closer to indifference or resentment toward future technology.
So when our nontechnical aunts refuse to upgrade from their Pentium III PCs with Windows 98 that work well enough for them and are set up exactly how they prefer, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.
The upgrade market for average PC owners is dead. We killed it.
It's not just "average" users – I consider myself to be above average (I used to fix computers for a living) and my auxiliary (i.e. non-Mac) laptop still runs Windows XP. The vast majority of software I care about still supports it, so why switch?
There's another reason for Vista's non-adoption rate that Arment doesn't mention – the ridiculously high number of different versions of the product. There are four different editions of the product (Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, and Ultimate), ranging in price from $200 - $320. Asking the "average" user to make that decision is practically planning to fail. Don't even get me started on Service Packs.
Read Marco.org - Why hasn't Vista sold well?.
(Via Daring Fireball.)
Labels: technology

I've been waiting for a new version of to-do manager Things for a while now; though I love the look & feel of Things and especially the iPhone sync support, it drives me a little nuts that the performance was so wonky. The application would hang a bit and become unresponsive from the main window (though I could always quit from the dock menu), and the window would sometimes turn completely blank (white). 


I really like the idea of Bento, a personal, inexpensive database program that runs locally on your Mac. (As opposed to a personal database program that runs on the web – 
Via
You hear that distant rumbling? 




I've seen microscopes that hook up to your computer via USB, but this looks like fun too -- a 200x microscope that hooks up directly to your TV. There's less utility in the Eyeclops version since you can only hook it up to your TV and you can't capture images without the computer. A computer version used with a laptop be more portable as well. But more people probably have big TVs they could attach to this gadget for some spontaneous, casual examinations of everyday objects at a bug's eye view.
My sister, knowing my devotion to all things Tivo, sent me this link to 

